Thanks for the assembler codes.
>>...I pasted the assembler code below and to me the two options look very similar even in assembler ( both have 6 commands
>>inside the loop), so I still don't know which of the two options to use...
If both versions are fast and there are No differences in performance ( let's say Not greater than 0.5% / also, you did Not provide any numbers ) then use a version you like!
PS: I like the 2nd version.
Thanks for the assembler codes.
>>...I pasted the assembler code below and to me the two options look very similar even in assembler ( both have 6 commands
>>inside the loop), so I still don't know which of the two options to use...
If both versions are fast and there are No differences in performance ( let's say Not greater than 0.5% / also, you did Not provide any numbers ) then use a version you like!
PS: I like the 2nd version.